*UGBAH & Ors V. UGBAH (2025) SC*

On 4th July 2025, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in *Ugbah & Ors v. Ugbah,* a case that tested whether a wife and children can sue for maintenance, welfare, and education while the marriage is still subsisting — and without first filing for divorce.

*Key Highlights*
The Case: Mrs. Veronica Ugbah sued her husband, Mr. Patrick Ugbah, seeking money for her upkeep, their children’s education, and alternative accommodation.

*The Objection:* The husband argued that such claims could only be made under the Matrimonial Causes Act (through a divorce or separation petition), not by a writ of summons.

*Lower Courts:* The High Court dismissed the objection, but the Court of Appeal struck out the case, insisting that only a petition under matrimonial law was proper.

*Supreme Court’s Verdict:* The apex Court disagreed with the Court of Appeal. It held that:

A wife does not need to file for divorce before asking for maintenance.

Children’s right to welfare and education is independent, enforceable, and not tied to divorce proceedings.

Courts must focus on substantial justice, not technicalities of procedure.

*Outcome:* The appeal was allowed, the High Court’s ruling was restored, and the wife and children’s claims were recognized as competent.

*Why It Matters*
This judgment underscores that:

Fathers remain legally bound to support their children whether or not a marriage is dissolved.

A wife can independently seek maintenance and support during marriage without being forced into divorce proceedings.

Courts will not allow technical rules to override the justice owed to vulnerable parties like wives and children.
3   
  • "A wife can independently seek maintenance and support during marriage without being forced into divorce proceedings."

    Does this mean in marriage, a... man is bound to provide upkeep/maintenance for a wife (I'm not talking about the children, here)? If so, it means Nigerian men will forever remain instruments of legalised slavery in the hands of Nigerian women. With this silly ruling it means a Nigerian wife may choose not to work, but depend on regular upkeep funds from the husband, while the husband overworks himself to death to fulfill that obligation. From all indications, this clause in the SC ruling suggests that the Supreme Court in Nigeria is still stuck in the woods. The law (especially this Nigerian law) is an ass more